•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The application of joint and several liability for joint infringement in food safety civil public interest litigation in China’s judicial practice was discussed, and on this basis, the existing problems were clarified. Then a perfect path was proposed to be distinguishing between collusion-type joint tort true joint and several liability and non-collusion-type joint infringement. Joint infringement real joint and several liability and non-conspiracy joint infringement are not real joint liability, and the litigation strategy is selected according to the different methods of public interest litigation. At the same time, it is necessary to recognize the applicable value of punitive damages and apply it effectively.

Publication Date

12-28-2021

First Page

71

Last Page

75,88

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.12.011

References

[1] 刘洲兰. 食品安全民事侵权的文本考察与完善进路[J]. 食品与机械, 2020, 36(12): 56-59.
[2] 裴宝莉. 食品消费惩罚性赔偿责任的完善维度[J]. 食品与机械, 2020, 36(3): 80-83.
[3] 杨立新. 侵权责任追偿权的“背锅”理论及法律关系展开: 对《民法典》规定的侵权责任追偿权规则的整理[J]. 求是学刊, 2021, 48(1): 125-135.
[4] 黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典侵权责任编释义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 91-92.
[5] 徐琪. 新《食品安全法实施条例》框架下行政处罚权的完善[J]. 食品与机械, 2020, 36(11): 71-73.
[6] 孙永立. 规范食品安全民事公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿实践探索[J]. 中国食品工业, 2021(11): 25-29.
[7] 朱晓峰. 论《民法典》中的惩罚性赔偿体系与解释标准[J]. 上海政法学院学报, 2021(1): 137-152.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.