•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the influence of processing technology on characteristic aroma components of Ampelopsis Grossedentata tea. Methods: Four different samples of A. Grossedentata were prepared by traditional processing technology, black tea processing technology, green tea processing technology and dark tea processing technology, and the key flavor compounds of different samples were analyzed by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry combined with relative odor activity (ROAV), taking the naturally dried A. Grossedentata leaves as control. Results: A total of 37 volatile flavor compounds were detected from 4 kinds of A. Grossedentata tea samples and control samples, among which 7 substances including 1-octene-3-ol, benzyl alcohol, β-ionone, phenylacetaldehyde, trans-2-hexenal, dihydroactinidiolide and methyl salicylate were common components in 4 kinds of samples. ROAV value showed that 1- octene-3-ol and β-ionone was the common key aroma components, Among them, β-ionone contributes the most. The key aroma components of A. Grossedentata tea are different under different processing conditions, and linalool and trans-2-nonenal, the iconic aroma components of black tea, were detected in the key aroma components of A. Grossedentata tea in black tea processing group. Conclusion: The aroma performance of A. Grossedentata tea processed by black tea technology and green tea technology is similar to that of traditional technology, but the aroma performance of dark tea technology is slightly inferior. Fermentation process can be considered as one of the optimal key processes for making A. Grossedentata tea.

Publication Date

12-28-2021

First Page

20

Last Page

25,31

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.12.003

References

[1] 吴海顺, 李伟业, 于华忠. 藤茶抗氧化活性成分及其应用研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(17): 26-29.
[2] 李佳川, 李思颖, 王优, 等. 藤茶化学成分、药理作用及质量标志物(Q-marker)预测分析[J]. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 47(3): 254-266.
[3] 王元霞, 洪正善, 杨柯, 等. 藤茶中二氢杨梅素的研究进展[J]. 沈阳药科大学学报, 2020, 37(6): 569-576.
[4] 张敏, 余佶, 王琪琰, 等. 基于熵权法和灰色关联分析的藤茶理化品质评价与分级应用[J]. 食品与机械, 2021, 37(1): 186-192.
[5] 张敏, 余佶, 王琪琰, 等. 藤茶感官特征定量描述分析与风味轮构建[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 134-139.
[6] 杨立娜, 吴凯为, 徐清莹, 等. 冠突散囊菌发酵对荔枝草茶主要成分及风味的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(13): 121-125.
[7] 刘威, 张永瑞, 鲁静, 等. 不同加工工艺刺槐花代用茶香气成分分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(1): 250-256.
[8] 王秋霜, 凌彩金, 乔小燕, 等. 萎凋及发酵时间对广东丹霞红茶香气及品质的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019, 39(3): 342-354.
[9] 李俊, 祝愿, 方舒婷, 等. 基于固相微萃取气质联用对贵州红茶香气成分特征的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(13): 304-316.
[10] 申东, 沈强, 潘科, 等. 基于HS-SPME/GC-MS定性半定量分析藤茶特征香气[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2010, 38(11): 67-70.
[11] 谢关华, 陆安霞, 欧阳珂, 等. GC-MS结合化学计量学用于探究六大茶类香气形成的差异[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(20): 260-270.
[12] 傅海峰, 林琼珍, 朱晨, 等. 6种不同香型白茶香气成分的GC-MS分析[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2020, 39(10): 91-97.
[13] 樊艳. SPME-GC-MS结合ROAV分析腐乳中的主体风味物质[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(8): 227-234.
[14] ZHU Yi-fan, CHEN Jing, CHEN Xing-jie, et al. Use of relative odor activity value (ROAV) to link aroma profiles to volatile compounds: application to fresh and dried eel[J]. International Journal of Food Properties, 2020, 23(1): 2 257-2 270.
[15] 杜勃峰, 丁筑红, 李达, 等. 基于SPME-GC-MS结合ROAV分析评价不同加工方式下皱椒辣椒粉风味品质[J]. 中国调味品, 2019, 44(8): 76-80.
[16] 金友兰, 黄甜, 蒋容港, 等. 不同类型发花砖茶特征香气成分研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(3): 188-196.
[17] 马士成, 王梦琪, 刘春梅, 等. 六堡茶挥发性成分中关键香气成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(20): 191-197.
[18] 马玉青, 方成刚, 夏丽飞, 等. 不同发酵程度对重萎凋“云抗10号”红茶香气成分的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(4): 760-768.
[19] 张厅, 刘晓, 熊元元, 等. 四川黑茶渥堆过程中主要品质成分和茶汤色差变化及其相关性研究[J/OL]. 食品与发酵工业. (2021-06-28)[2021-09-23]. https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.026946.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.