Abstract
The purpose of this study is to apply the concept of Kansei Engineering and Kano Model to improve the design of ceramic containers for food packaging to better meet the needs of customers. Kansei Engineering is used as a design element to capture and transform the perceived (Kansei words) of the consumer. The design object should be examined in a comprehensive context. The paper used sampling method, case analysis method and questionnaire method. The result of this study was that the main factors that affect the consumer satisfaction of the ceramic container for food packaging could be divided into appearance and performance factors. Appearance factors became more preferable in product design and development. Efforts should be made to find out the appearance factors that should be included between Kansei and Related words and design elements. The comprehensive form of ceramic products should complement each other and function flexibly. Therefore, the ceramic packaging container products should have parabolic design elements, artificial plane decoration, glaze, texture and block / closed color.
Publication Date
7-28-2018
First Page
115
Last Page
120
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2018.07.025
Recommended Citation
Yushan, ZHANG
(2018)
"Design of ceramic containers products for food packaging based on kansei engineering,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 34:
Iss.
7, Article 25.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2018.07.025
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol34/iss7/25
References
[1] SHONA Brown, KATHLEEN Eisenhardt. Competing on the Edge[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998: 127-128.
[2] MITSUO Nagamachi, MASAMI Tachikawa, NOBUYUKI N Imanishi, et al. A successful statistical procedure on kansei engineer-ing products[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2008, 23(2): 20-24.
[3] CARMEN Llinares, ALVARO F Page. Kano Model in Kansei Engineering to Evaluate Subjective Real Estate Consumer Preferences[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2011, 41(3): 233-246.
[4] WANG Kun-chieh, JU Fang-rong. An Innovative Design Methodology KKBDCA for Affective Product Development[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013(6):1-10.
[5] FRID Sayifoelida, SAIFUDIN Hafiz Yahaya, HAERYIP Sihomb-ing, et al. The Integration Framework of Kansei Engineering (KE) and Kano Method for Product Development[C]//Maria Forsyth. ACSME’2014. London: Routledge, 2014: 302-310.
[6] RANDY Jacobs. Evaluating Satisfaction with Media Products and Services: An Attribute Based Approach[J]. European Media Management Review, 1999, 15(3): 67-71.
[7] 刘楚玉, 王海林, 陈荣, 等. 基于感性工学的产品设计与评价方法[J]. 包装工程, 2012(10): 90-94.
[8] 李国伟. 应用感性工学理论实施产品设计的方法探讨[J]. 中小企业管理与科技: 下旬刊, 2010(3): 255.
[9] Wikipedia. Kansei Studies: Kansei engineering. （2018-01-24）[2018-05-15]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansei_engineering.
[10] 李华刚. 基于感性工学的产品设计方法[J].人民论坛, 2015(33): 181-182.
[11] 李立新. 探寻设计艺术的真相[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2008: 14-15.
[12] 李砚祖. 设计新理念: 感性工学[J]. 新美术, 2003(4): 20-25.
[13] YOGI Akao. History of Quality Function Deployment in Japan, International Academy for Quality Books Series: Vol. 3[M]. Hansa: Baumgarten, 1990: 56-57.
[14] ALEXANDER Gottlieb Baumgarten. Aesthetica[M]. Hildesh-eim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1961: 73-74.
[15] SIMON Schutte. Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design: Kansei Engineering in Development [M]. Linkoping: UniTryck Linkoping, Linkoping universitet, 2005: 83-85.
[16] SIMON Schutte. Designing Feelings into Products: Integrating Kansei Engineering Methodology in Product Development[J]. Linkoping Studies in Science and Technology, 2002, 33(4): 213-221.
[17] 张燕丽, 黄淑伟. 基于联合分析的教师素养评价研究[J]. 教育现代化, 2017(6): 59-62, 66.
[18] 刘楚玉, 王海林, 陈荣, 等. 基于感性工学的产品设计与评价方法[J]. 包装工程, 2012(10): 90-94.
[19] 李正安. 陶瓷设计[M]. 杭州: 中国美术学院出版社, 2002: 56-59.
[20] ROBERT W Proctor, JING Chen. The Role of Human Factors/Ergonomics in the Science of Security: Decision Making and Action Selection in Cyberspace[J]. Human Factors, 2015, 21(1): 721-727.
[21] 阮家龙. 人体工程学在产品设计中的重要性[J]. 科技信息: 科学教研, 2008(7): 653.
[22] 万长林. 基于感性工学的日用陶瓷设计[J]. 中国陶瓷, 2011(8): 40-43, 49.