•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The provisions of the new Food Safety Law on administrative penalty have changed from individual-oriented to legal person-oriented, the intensity of punishment has increased and the number of punished objects for the same illegal act has increased, which is the institutional motivation for many administrative penalty disputes that did not exist before. In the practice of administrative penalties for food safety, the increasing possibility of abusing discretion by administrative supervision departments, the lack of operational rules and standards for administrative penalties, and the lack of scientific and unified hearing procedures are the practical mechanisms that may lead to administrative penalty disputes. Therefore, in order to effectively curb and resolve administrative penalty disputes from the source, we can promote the improvement of the food legal system and the modernization of the governance capacity from the dimensions of establishing an open system of administrative penalty decision-making process, formulating rules for the implementation of administrative penalties for food safety and establishing a scientific and standardized hearing procedure for administrative penalties, so as to enhance the effectiveness of food safety supervision.

Publication Date

4-28-2019

First Page

68

Last Page

71,162

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2019.04.013

References

[1] 任端平, 郗文静, 任波. 新食品安全法的十大亮点(二)[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2015, 41(8): 1-6.
[2] 孙春伟. 新食品安全法关于监管部门的责任制度评析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, 37(3): 28-30.
[3] 霍敬裕, 鲁霖. 食品安全授权立法研究[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(13): 271-276.
[4] 赵鹏. 超越平台责任: 网络食品交易规制模式之反思[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2017, 36(1): 60-71.
[5] 张志业, 聂艳萍, 刘权乐, 等. 全方位食品安全诚信体系构建研究: 以《食品安全法》的修订为视角[J]. 广西社会科学, 2016, 24(12): 120-123.
[6] 杨明. 我国互联网食品安全监管的现状、困境与优化对策[J]. 中国食品学报, 2017, 17(11): 187-197.
[7] 李长健, 鲁爱蓉. 食品安全法中惩罚性赔偿制度的适用与完善[J]. 食品与机械, 2018, 34(10): 66-68, 207.
[8] 李容琴. 新《食品安全法》下保健食品监管难题及其应对措施[J]. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(11): 229-231.
[9] 许新. 我国食品安全行政处罚听证制度研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2016: 8-9.
[10] 欧阳志刚. 论行政执法自由裁量权的正当性[J]. 求索, 2012, 42(3): 119-121.
[11] 毕玉谦. 论庭审过程中法官的心证公开[J]. 法律适用, 2017, 33(7): 46-53.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.