Influence of different pressure on heat transfer of nozzle with different sizes

Authors

GU Hanwen, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic Product Processing & Preservation, Shanghai 201306, China; Shanghai Professional Technology Service Platform on Cold Chain Equipment Performance and Energy Saving Evaluation, Shanghai 201306, China; National
XIE Jing, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic Product Processing & Preservation, Shanghai 201306, China; Shanghai Professional Technology Service Platform on Cold Chain Equipment Performance and Energy Saving Evaluation, Shanghai 201306, China; National
WANG Jinfeng, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic Product Processing & Preservation, Shanghai 201306, China; Shanghai Professional Technology Service Platform on Cold Chain Equipment Performance and Energy Saving Evaluation, Shanghai 201306, China; National

Abstract

Food industry is demanding higher and higher quality of frozen food, and the quickfreezer can well meet this requirement. In this study, the internal flow field of quick freezer with slit nozzle type was taken as the research object.Three different sizes of nozzle structures based on inlet pressure of 190 Pa, 170 Pa and 160 Pa, numerical simulation and field test of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were used to compare the differences of internal flow field and heat transfer characteristics of three nozzle structures under different pressure conditions. The results showed that the outlet wind velocity, Nusselt number and uniformity of slit nozzle T₀ at 190 Pa were better than those at 170 Pa, and the cross-flow wind velocitywas also lower. The exit wind velocity, Nusselt number and uniformity ratio of slit nozzle T₁ at 170 Pa weregood, but the crossing flow wind velocity increased. Compared with T₂, the slit nozzleT₀ had lower cross flow velocity at the same inlet pressure. In terms of heat transfer intensity, when the inlet pressure was 190 Pa, the local Nusselt number of strip surface corresponding to slit nozzle T₁was the largest, while the average Nusselt number of T₀ and T₁was not much different. In terms of heat transfer uniformity, the slit nozzle T₀ had the lowest non-uniformity and the most uniform heat transfer when the inlet pressure was 190 Pa. Therefore, when the mass flow rate of air was the same, the slit nozzle T₀ corresponding to the inlet pressure of 190 Pa could better improve the heat transfer efficiency, and could increase the freezing rate of foods.

Publication Date

4-28-2019

First Page

87

Last Page

92

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2019.04.017

Recommended Citation

Hanwen, GU; Jing, XIE; and Jinfeng, WANG (2019) "Influence of different pressure on heat transfer of nozzle with different sizes," Food and Machinery: Vol. 35: Iss. 4, Article 17.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2019.04.017
Available at: https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol35/iss4/17

References

[1] HUAN Zhong-jie, MA Yi-tai, HE Shao-shu. Airflow blockage and guide technology on energy saving for spiral quick-freezer[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2003, 26(6): 644-651.
[2] MAGHRABIE H M, ATTALLA M, FAWAZ H E, et al. Numerical investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop of in-line array of heated obstacles cooled by jet impingement in cross-flow[J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2017, 56(3): 285-296.
[3] PENUMADU P S, RAO A G. Numerical investigations of heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics in multiple jet impingement system[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 110: 1 511-1 524.
[4] LAVISSE B, LEFEBVRE A, TORRANCE A, et al. The effects of the flow rate and speed of lubricoolant jets on heat transfer in the contact zone when grinding a nitrided steel[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2018, 35: 233-243.
[5] GIACHETTI B, COUTON D, FNOT M, et al. Influence of multi-perforation synthetic jet configuration on heat transfer enhancement[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 125: 262-273.
[6] IANIRO A, CARDONE G. Heat transfer rate and uniformi-ty in multichannel swirling impinging jets[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2012, 49(1): 89-98.
[7] YU Ping-ping, ZHU Ke-qian, SUN Tao, et al. Heat transfer rate and uniformity of mist flow jet impingement for glass tempering[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 115: 368-378.
[8] LI Yu-lin, LI Feng, TANG Ju-ming, et al. Radio frequency tempering uniformity investigation of frozen beef with various shapes and sizes[J]. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2018, 48: 42-55.
[9] LI Dong-mei, ZHU Zhi-wei, SUN Da-wei. Effects of freezing on cell structure of fresh cellular food materials: A review[J]. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2018, 75: 46-55.
[10] MCGUINN A, RYLATT D I, O’DONOVAN T S. Heat transfer enhancement to an array of synthetic air jets by an induced crossflow[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 103: 996-1 003.
[11] ATTALLA M, MAGHRABIE H M, QAYYUM A, et al. Influence of the nozzle shape on heat transfer uniformity for in-line array of impinging air jets[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 120: 160-169.
[12] 王金锋, 李文俊, 谢晶, 等. 两种喷嘴结构对冲击式速冻机流场及换热特征的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2017, 33(12): 80-85, 90.
[13] LIANG Xu, JIN Lan, MA Yong-hao, et al. Numerical study on heat transfer by swirling impinging jets issuing from a screw-thread nozzle[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 115: 232-237.
[14] GUAN Tao, ZHANG Jing-zhou, SHAN Yong. Convective heat transfer by a row of tab-excited impinging jets on a wedge-shaped concave surface[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2016, 100: 37-53.
[15] 朱红均. FLUENT12流体分析及工程仿真[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011: 6-8.
[16] ZHU Xiao-wei, ZHU Lei, ZHAO Jing-quan. An in-depth analysis of conjugate heat transfer process of impingement jet[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 104: 1 259-1 267.
[17] SINGH D, PREMACHANDRAN B, KOHLI S. Effect of nozzle shape on jet impingement heat transfer from a circular cylinder[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2015, 96: 45-69.
[18] 王金锋, 李文俊, 谢晶, 等. 速冻机宽度方向上流场的实验分析[J]. 热能动力工程, 2018, 33(4): 110-114.
[19] 陈黎卿, 张栋, 陈无畏. 基于流固耦合的分动器齿轮两相流动数值模拟与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014(4): 54-61.
[20] 闻建龙. 工程流体力学[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2011: 55-65.
[21] MATTEO M, ROBERTO C. Acceleration and wall pressure fluctuations generated by an incompressible jet in installed configuration[J]. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2018, 346(10): 919-931.
[22] 唐君言, 邵双全, 徐洪波, 等. 冲击式速冻机气流组织模拟与实验研究[J]. 制冷学报, 2018(4): 12.
[23] 张珍, 谢晶. 带有上下均风孔板的速冻装置中流场及温度场的数值模拟[J]. 制冷学报, 2009, 30(5): 36-40.
[24] 张传杰, 孙纪宁, 谭屏. 横流对冲击射流换热特性影响机理的数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(1): 65-71.
[25] LINGLING C, ROBIN B, BERNHARD W, et al. Experimental and numerical heat transfer investigation of an impingement jet array with V-ribs on the target plate and on the impingement plate[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2017, 68: 126-138.
[26] 谢晶, 柳雨嫣, 王金锋. 喷嘴结构对气流冲击式速冻机钢带表面换热特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018(34): 292-298.
[27] INGOLE S, SUNDARAM K. Experimental average Nusselt number characteristics with inclined non-confined jet impingement of air for cooling application[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016, 77: 124-131.
[28] 马朝, 严超, 曹学伟, 等. 阵列空气射流传热均匀性问题的数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2016, 37(11): 2 378-2 384.