Abstract
Under the same other manufacturing conditions, cut tobacco structure, slim cigarette physical quality, mainstream smoke components and sensory quality were analyzed with different cutting widths such as 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 mm. The influence of cutting width on cut tobacco structure, physical indexes, mainstream smoke content and sensory quality of slim cigarette was explored. The results were showed as follows: ① In the range of 0.6～1.0 mm, whole cut rate was positively correlated with cutting width, and broken cut rate was negatively with cutting width. ② There were all significant negative correlations between draw resistance, total ventilation rate, tar content and cutting width. At the cutting width of 0.6～0.8 mm, and the residual or relative residuals between slim cigarette weight, draw resistance, hardness, total ventilation rate, tar content value and corresponding design value were relatively close to 0. ③ Slim cigarette sensory quality was gradually improved as the cutting width decreases. Combined with the physical indexes, mainstream smoke content, sensory quality and cut tobacco structure, shredding and cost under the different cutting widths, cutting width of 0.7～0.8 mm was suitable to slim cigarette.
Publication Date
2-28-2021
First Page
194
Last Page
198
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.02.033
Recommended Citation
Hua-cheng, GUO; Yan-yan, WU; Jun-song, ZHANG; Yuan-yang, ZHU; Hai-min, GAO; Yan-xie, ZOU; and Rui-li, LI
(2021)
"Influences of cut tobacco width on physical indexes, mainstream smoke and sensory quality of slim cigarette,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 37:
Iss.
2, Article 33.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.02.033
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol37/iss2/33
References
[1] 王金棒, 邱纪青, 郑新章, 等. 中国细支烟专利技术研究热点及趋势分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2018, 51(12): 65-71.
[2] 向军, 李莲喜. 一种细支烟通用型切纸轮的设计与研究[J]. 机械工程师, 2019(3): 120-124.
[3] 董艳娟, 田海英, 高明奇, 等. 卷烟纸参数对细支卷烟烟气常规成分释放量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2018, 51(6): 51-57.
[4] 楚文娟, 胡少东, 田海英, 等. 滤嘴参数对细支烟主流烟气中代表性香味成分释放量的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(1): 1-7.
[5] 刘德强, 贾洋, 王乐军, 等. 烟丝结构对烟支卷制质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(32): 18 589-18 590.
[6] 王夏婷, 潘文, 邹泉, 等. 2种叶片成丝方式对细支卷烟质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(23): 177-180, 191.
[7] 黄宇航. 制丝工序不同工艺参数对卷烟质量的影响研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2016: 22-23.
[8] 田忠, 陈闯, 许宗保, 等. 制丝关键工序对细支卷烟燃烧温度及主流烟气成分的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2015, 21(6): 19-26.
[9] 王旭锋, 刘蒙蒙, 李向阳, 等. 制丝关键工序对卷烟感官质量和卷制质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(8): 96-97, 112.
[10] 肖克毅, 戴亚, 杨文敏, 等. 制丝工艺参数对卷烟主流烟气苯并芘释放量的效应分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(17): 70-74, 105.
[11] 杨洋, 高辉, 王慧, 等. 不同宽度烟丝组合对卷烟物理指标及其综合稳定性的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2017, 32(3): 488-497.
[12] 刘静, 赵佳成, 高辉, 等. 不同切丝宽度烟丝在干燥过程中挥发性香味物质的变化[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 33(1): 79-89.
[13] 赵佳成, 高辉, 王慧, 等. 滚筒干燥过程中不同切丝宽度烟丝挥发性有机酸的变化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, 37(24): 144-148, 152.
[14] 王艳丽, 崔龙吉, 金哲, 等. 切丝宽度对卷烟烟丝结构和主流烟气的影响[J]. 延边大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 42(2): 147-150.
[15] 司晓喜, 朱瑞芝, 杨建云, 等. 切丝宽度对卷烟主流烟气气溶胶粒径分布的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(2): 88-95.
[16] 赵佳成, 高辉, 王慧, 等. 切丝宽度对烟丝结构及其分布稳定性的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2017, 32(4): 668-677.
[17] 王宗英, 史建新, 王永红, 等. 切丝宽度对中支卷烟烟丝结构、烟支理化指标及感官质量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2020, 53(1): 81-88.
[18] 司晓喜, 朱瑞芝, 杨建云, 等. 切丝宽度对卷烟主流烟气气溶胶粒径分布的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(2): 88-95.
[19] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 卷烟 第5部分: 主流烟气: GB 5606.5—2005[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005: 1-2.