Abstract
Current procedural connection challenges in the administrative and criminal connection in the food safety field are a lack of relevant legal norms, low-level standards, insufficient coordination among all parties involved, unclear transfer criteria for cases, and inadequate evidence conversion and connection. To address these challenges, measures can be taken from several aspects:expanding the procedural rules for administrative and criminal connection in the food safety field, clarifying the transfer system, establishing a multi-party cooperation mechanism between administrative and judicial authorities, and standardizing the recognition and application of evidence in the administrative and criminal connection. These efforts aim to comprehensively ensure effective solutions to the procedural connection challenges in the administrative and criminal connection in the food safety field.
Publication Date
11-19-2025
First Page
43
Last Page
47
DOI
10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2025.60088
Recommended Citation
Fen, XIE
(2025)
"Challenges and breakthroughs in the procedure of administrative and criminal connection in food safety field,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 41:
Iss.
10, Article 6.
DOI: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2025.60088
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol41/iss10/6
References
[1] 王诗华.审视与展望:我国食品安全领域行刑衔接问题研究[J].河南社会科学,2022,30(4):55-64.WANG S H.Review and prospect:research on the connection of execution in the field of food safety in my country [J].Henan Social Sciences,2022,30(4):55-64.
[2] 周佑勇.行政执法与刑事司法的双向衔接研究:以食品安全案件移送为视角 [J].中国刑事法杂志,2022 (4):47-63.ZHOU Y Y.Administrative and criminal coherence through the lens of transferring the food safety cases [J].Criminal Science,2022 (4):47-63.
[3] 李永升,杨攀.我国食品安全犯罪的立法缺陷与优化路径 [J].昆明理工大学学报 (社会科学版 ),2024,24(4):1-10.LI Y S,YANG P.Legislative deficiencies of food safety crime and its optimization paths in China [J].Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences ),2024,24(4):1-10.
[4] 杨寅.论我国食品安全领域的行刑衔接制度法学评论 [J].法学评论,2021,39(3):130-139.YANG Y.On connection of administrative and criminal punishment systems in field of food safety in China [J].Law Review,2021,39(3):130-139.
[5] 方颉琳.数字检察赋能行刑衔接：前提、可行性及路径 [J].山东科技大学学报 (社会科学版 ),2025,27(1):32-39.FANG J L.Digital prosecution empowers the connection between administrative procedure and criminal procedure:prerequisites,feasibility,and pathways [J].Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences ),2025,27(1):32-39.
[6] 戴为卿.国际新兴食品领域的法律监管及其借鉴 [J].食品与机械,2025,41(3):62-66.DAI W Q.Legal supervision of international emerging food fields and its reference [J].Food & Machinery,2025,41(3):62-66.
[7] 赵 旭 光,杨 林 霈,顾 斯 琪.行 刑 衔 接 中 的 检 察 监 督 机 制 构 建:以 食 品 安 全 领 域 行 政 执 法 与 刑 事 司 法 为 例 [J].南 都 学 坛,2023,43(4):75-84.ZHAO X G,YANG L P,GU S Q.The construction of prosecutorial supervision mechanism in connecting administrative law enforcement and criminal justice:taking administrative law enforcement and criminal justice in the field of food safety as an example [J].Academic Forum of Nandu,2023,43(4):75-84.
[8] 谈在祥,魏苏璟.食品安全犯罪司法裁量要素法律实证研究[J].卫生法学,2025,33(2):42-49.TAN Z X,WEI S J.An empirical legal study on judicial discretionary factors in food safety crimes [J].Health Law,2025,33(2):42-49.