Abstract
Food safety administrative public interest litigation not only constitutes a statutory scope of administrative public interest litigation but also forms a part of China's social co -governance system for food safety.The pre -trial procedures in this context hold an independent value as a crucial institutional design for the balance between administrative power and procuratorial power.From the perspective of food safety social co -governance,the pre -trial procedures serve as the optimal mechanism for ensuring regulatory accountability of administrative agencies.Current issues occurring in pre -trial procedures in food safety administrative public interest litigation are examined including independent status and professional deficiency in judicial practice.Optimization pathways are then proposed,such as advancing relevant legislation and incorporating multi -stakeholder participation.
Publication Date
4-25-2025
First Page
57
Last Page
61
DOI
10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2025.60038
Recommended Citation
Hang, YUAN and Nawei, LI
(2025)
"Optimization analysis of pre-trial procedures for food safety administrative public interest litigation from the perspective of social co-governance,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 41:
Iss.
3, Article 9.
DOI: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2025.60038
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol41/iss3/9
References
[1] 王钰瑛,柴文杰.新时代食品安全法治保障研究 [J].现代食品,2022,28(12):146-149.WANG Y Y,CHAI W J.Study on the legal guarantee of food safety in the new era [J].Modern Food,2022,28(12):146-149.
[2] 秦利,宋梦哲.社会共治视角下食品安全治理能力现代化内涵及实现研究综述 [J].食品与机械,2020,36(8):82-87.QIN L,SONG M Z.A review on the connotation and realization of modernization of food safety control ability from the perspective of social co-governance [J].Food & Machinery,2020,36(8):82-87.
[3] 高志宏.食品安全社会共治模式的法治进路 [J].学习与实践,2023 (4):83-90.GAO Z H.The rule of law approach to the social co-governance model of food safety [J].Study and Practice,2023 (4):83-90.[4] 万进福.行政公益诉讼规则研究 [M].北京:中国法制出版社,2022:109.WAN J F.Study on administrative public interest interest litigation rules [M].Beijing:China Legal Publishing House,2022:109.
[5] 胡卫列.中国检察公益诉讼基本特征和理论制度构建 [J].人民检察,2019 (15):49-50.HU W L.The basic oretigal and institution establishment of procuatorial public interest litigation in China [J].People's Procuratorial Semimonthly,2019 (15):49-50.
[6] 中华人民共和国最高人民检察院.最高人民检察院工作报告（2025年3月8日 应勇）[EB/OL ].(2025 -03-09) [2025 -03-10].http://www.gj.jcy/zgrmjcy/gzbg/ 1899642694771351554.html.Supreme People 's Procuratorate of the People 's Republic of China.The work report of the supreme people 's procuratorate（2025 -03-08 YING Yong ）[EB/OL ].(2025 -03-09) [2025 -03-10].http://www.gj.jcy/zgrmjcy/gzbg/ 1899642694771351554.html.
[7] 崔卓兰,于立深.行政自制与中国行政法治发展 [J].法学研究,2010,32(1):35-47.CUI Z L,YU L S.Administrative self:restraint and the rule of administrative law in China [J].Chinese Journal of Law,2010,32(1):35-47.
[8] 王春业.行政公益诉讼 “诉前程序 ”检视 [J].社会科学,2018(6):94-103.WANG C Y.Review on "pre-litigation procedure" of administrative public interest litigation [J].Journal of Social Sciences,2018 (6):94-103.
[9] 方颉琳,冯庆俊.通往行政公益诉讼诉前程序实质化之路:以检察机关和行政机关良性互动为视角 [J].行政与法,2022 (7):98-105.FANG J L,FENG Q J.The road to substantialize the pre-litigation procedure of administrative public interest litigation:from the perspective of benign interaction between procuratorates and administrations [J].Administration and Law,2022 (7):98-105.
[10] 吕忠梅.“人与自然和谐共生 ”视野下的环境法价值论 [J].政治与法律,2023 (7):2-17.LYU Z M.On the doctrine of value of environmental law under the perspective of "harmonious coexistence between humanity and nature" [J].Political Science and Law,2023 (7):2-17.
[11] 秦前红,陈家勋.打造适于直面行政权的检察监督 [J].探索,2020 (6):68-83.QIN Q H,CHEN J X.To build prosecutorial supervision suitable for facing the executive power [J].Probe,2020 (6):68-83.
[12] 胡卫列,迟晓燕.从试点情况看行政公益诉讼诉前程序 [J].国家检察官学院学报,2017,25(2):30-48,170-171.HU W L,CHI X Y.Study on the procedure before the administrative public interest litigation-based on the cases of experimental unit [J].Journal of National Prosecutors College,2017,25(2):30-48,170-171.