Abstract
After the revision of Article 33 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Administrative Penalty in 2021 established the "no penalty for first violation" system, its application in the field of food safety has attracted significant attention from both academic and practical communities. This study starts with Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, and combine with the List of Administrative Violations Not Subject to Penalties for First Offenses issued by the State Administration for Market Regulation and local practices, such as Beijing's rule that "expired food is exempt from penalty if the value of the goods is ≤200 yuan" and Shanghai's rule that "special foods sold together are exempt from penalty". The application logic and institutional tension of "no penalty for first violation" in the food safety domain are systematically analyzed. While responding to the policy orientation of optimizing the business environment, this system faces the conflict between the principle-based provisions of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Administrative Penalty and the fragmentation of local regulations, as well as the value imbalances between the high-risk nature of food safety and the fault-tolerance space for enterprises. Through normative analysis and empirical examination, an optimization path has been proposed, including establishing a unified national benchmark for food safety exemption from penalties, setting up a linkage mechanism of "exemption from penalty +credit supervision +heavier penalties for repeat offenders" and excluding high-risk illegal acts from application, to achieve a dynamic balance between ensuring food safety and maintaining market vitality.
Publication Date
5-15-2026
First Page
81
Last Page
87
DOI
10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2025.80543
Recommended Citation
Jiang, SHAO
(2026)
"Application and controversy of "no penalty for first violation" policy in the field of food safety,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 42:
Iss.
4, Article 10.
DOI: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2025.80543
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol42/iss4/10
References
[1] 张聪.市场监管总局印发市场监管领域行政违法行为首违不罚、轻微免罚清单 [J].食品安全导刊,2025 (6):6-7.ZHANG C.The State Administration for Market Regulation issued the list of administrative violations in the field of market regulation that are not punished for the first violation and exempted from punishment for minor offenses [J].China Food Safety Magazine,2025 (6):6-7.
[2] 黄浩霖,冯雅黎,周淳之,等.食品执法 “首违不罚 ”制度的现实困境与完善路径 [J].中国食品药品监管,2023 (6):80-89,137.HUANG H L,FENG Y L,ZHOU C Z,et al.The realistic challenges and institutional improvement of the "no penalty for first violation" system in food law enforcement [J].China Food & Drug Administration Magazine,2023 (6):80-89,137.
[3] 周 雨 轩.食 品 安 全 “重 典 治 乱 ”与 优 化 营 商 环 境 价 值 平 衡 [J].食品工业,2023,44(8):339-343.ZHOU Y X.Food safety "severe epidemic and chaos control" and optimizing the value balance of business environment [J].The Food Industry,2023,44(8):339-343.
[4] 赖诗攀,陈奕醇.从柔性预防到重典治乱:我国食品安全违法治理的模式变革 [J].实证社会科学,2023,11(1):72-89.LAI S P,CHEN Y C.From gentle prevention to severe punishment:a transformation of China's food safety violation governance style [J].Social Science Research,2023,11(1):72-89.
[5] 应 松 年,章 剑 生.行 政 处 罚 法 教 程 [M].北 京:法 律 出 版 社,2012:172.YIN S N,ZHANG J S.Administrative punishment law tutorial[M].Beijing:Legal Publishing House,2012:172.
[6] 熊樟林.应受行政处罚行为模型论 [J].法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),2021,39(5):70.XIONG Z L.Model of administrative punishment behavior [J].Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law),2021,39(5):70.
[7] 林轲亮,莫晨宇,杨海.食品安全领域免罚清单制度的反思与重构 [J].食品与机械,2023,39(1):67-72,178.LIN K L,MO C Y,YANG H.The reflection and reconstruction of the penalty exemption list system in the field of food safety[J].Food & Machinery,2023,39(1):67-72,178.
[8] 邓 佑 文.谦 抑 理 念 在 行 政 处 罚 中 的 展 开 [J].法 学,2022 (10):18-31.DENG Y W.The development of modesty in administrative punishment [J].Law Science,2022 (10):18-31.
[9] 史高嫣.中国旅游食品安全问题及保障体系的建立 [J].食品与机械,2021,37(9):87-90.SHI G Y.Safety issues of tourism food and the establishment of the relative security system in China [J].Food & Machinery,2021,37(9):87-90.
[10] 熊 樟 林.《行 政 处 罚 法 》主 观 过 错 条 款 适 用 展 开 [J].中 国 法学,2023 (2):109.XIONG Z L.Application of subjective fault clause in administrative punishment law [J].China Legal Science,2023(2):109.
[11] 吉丽颖.法经济学视角下中国食品安全事件的规制维度 [J].食品与机械,2018,34(12):63-66.JI L Y.Regulation dimension of food safety events in China from the perspective of economics of law [J].Food & Machinery,2018,34(12):63-66.
[12] 凉都高新市监.食品安全领域哪些情形适用 “首违不罚、轻微 免 罚 ”? [EB/OL ].(2025 -02-13) [2025 -04-05].http://m.toutiao.com/group/ 7470788947390054975 /?upstream_biz=doubao.Donglou High-tech City Supervision.What are the circumstances applicable to "no penalty for first violation,no penalty for minor violations" in the field of food safety ? [EB/OL].(2025 -02-13) [2025 -04-05].http://m.toutiao.com/group/7470788947390054975 /?upstream_biz=doubao.
[13] 傅馨.行政处罚中 “首违不罚 ”的法律适用困境与完善 [J].中国价格监管与反垄断,2025 (2):116-118.FU X.The legal application dilemma and improvement of "no penalty for first violation" in administrative punishment [J].Price Supervision and Anti-monopoly in China,2025 (2):116-118.
[14] 魏胜娟.行政处罚中 “首违不罚 ”的适用规则 [J].中国价格监管与反垄断,2023 (8):27-30.WEI S J.Application rules of "no penalty for first violation" in administrative punishment [J].Price Supervision and Anti-monopoly in China,2023 (8):27-30.
[15] 陈胜,唐娴蔚.论行政首违不罚制度的基础与完善 [J].宁德师范学院学报 (哲学社会科学版),2023 (2):24-29.CHEN S,TANG X W.On the foundation and improvement of the system of no punishment for first offenders in administration [J].Journal of Ningde Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2023 (2):24-29.
