Food problem is a major issue related to national and social stability, but due to the constraints of various factors, food criminal regulation in Chinese exists provisions of "Criminal Law" and "Food Safety Law" lack of coordination, lack of support for food safety hazards regulation of a type of crime, lack of reasonable punishment setting and other issues. But Taiwan there are a rich experience in Taiwan, which not only focus on the convergence of food safety criminal law and other laws, but also has a wide range of criminal regulation of food safety in the penalty set Scientifically. Therefore, Chinese mainland can learn from Taiwan's experience in this area, coordinated "Criminal Law" and the contents of the food safety law, expanding the scope of criminal regulation, additional possession crimes, punishment perfect setting, additional qualifications punishment, to let criminal Regulation role play better in guaranteeing food safety.

Publication Date


First Page


Last Page





[1] 梅传强,秦宗川.海峡两岸危害食品犯罪刑法规制比较研究[J].海峡法学,2014(2):3~15.
[2] 毕博.台湾食品安全监管法律制度及其借鉴意义[J].安徽农业科学,2013(1):2 261~2 262.
[3] 陈政位,范宇平,李天裕.台湾猪肉安全制度管理探讨——以病(毙)死猪犯罪防治为例[J].农业经济半年刊(台湾),2008(83):103.
[4] 黄俊凌.台湾食品安全监管体系的现状、问题及其发展趋势[J].台湾研究,2014(2):97~93.
[5] 左袖阳.食品安全刑法立法的回顾与展望[J].湖北社会科学,2012(5):149.
[6] 刘仁文.中国食品安全的刑法规制[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2012(4):110.
[7] 张明楷.简评近年来的刑事司法解释[J].清华法学,2014(1):15.
[8] 全世文,曾寅初.我国食品犯罪的惩处强度及其相关因素分析——基于160例食品犯罪案件的分析[J].中国刑事法杂志,2013(4):89.
[9] 李荣.我国刑罚体系外资格刑的整合[J].法学论坛,2007(3):66~71.
[10] 张伟珂.资格刑类型扩充论——以《刑法修正案(八)》为视角[J].新疆警官高等专科学校学报,2011(4):21.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.